Cases 11 - 20 of 177
Edwin Romero v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2105
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ROMERO
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Edwin Romero v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2015
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ROMERO
Omar Miller v. Superintendent Rockview SCI
as 24-1947
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Plaintiff:
OMAR MILLER
John Koehler v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-9000
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH KOEHLER
Calvin Lynch v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1972
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. LYNCH
Douglas Welsh v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1556
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS DEAN WELSH
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Aquil Johnson v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
AQUIL JOHNSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Earl Handfield, II v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1219
Plaintiff:
EARL C. HANDFIELD, II
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Sidney Clayton v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1103
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY W. CLAYTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Obataiya Scott v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1134
Plaintiff:
OBATAIYA SCOTT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
