Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
HAWKINS v. FEDERAL NATL. MORTGAGE ASSN. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv06068
Plaintiff: NICOLE HAWKINS
Defendant: FEDERAL NATL. MORTGAGE ASSN. , SETERUS, INC. , SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HLISTA et al v. SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00835
Plaintiff: ALEXANDRA HLISTA and ANTHONY HLISTA
Defendant: SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES, LLC and JOHN BRADLEY DUVALL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PLATEK v. SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01607
Plaintiff: WILLIAM J. PLATEK, JR.
Defendant: SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES INC., THE LAW OFFICES OF MARK UDREN AND ASSOCIATES and HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BERMAN v. US BANK NA et al
as 2:2012cv04150
Plaintiff: YISROEL BERMAN
Defendant: US BANK NA, U.S. BANCORP, SAFEGUARD ASSET MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KARPA et al v. SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES, INC et al
as 2:2011cv01167
Plaintiff: KEN KARPA and MARGARET KARPA
Defendant: SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES, INC , THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC , PNC BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VUKMAN v. BENEFICIAL CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv01088
Plaintiff: PAMELA A. VUKMAN
Defendant: BENEFICIAL CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY , MARTHA E. VON ROSENSTIEL P.C., SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CLAY et al v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv01327
Plaintiff: ANTHONY CLAY, KAREN E. BONEY-CLAY and CLAY BROTHERS, INC.
Defendant: OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP. and SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?