Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Beazley et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co et al
as 6:2016cv01188
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kim Beazley , Lillian Marie Beazley , Jordon Kale Beazley and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co and Schlumberger Technology Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Venable v. Schlumberger Technology Corp
as 6:2016cv00763
Plaintiff:
Jack Venable, Jr
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Meyer v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.
as 3:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Matthew Meyer
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Jackson v. Schlumberger Ltd (Schlumberger N V)
as 6:2016cv00374
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Schlumberger Technology Corp v McReynolds et al
as 5:2015cv02455
Plaintiff:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Defendant:
Donald McReynolds and Arklatex Wireline Services L L C
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Dewan, et al v. M-I, L.L.C.
as 4:2015cv01746
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dewan
Defendant:
M-I, L.L.C. , Smith International Acquisition Corp. and Schlumberger Technology Corp
Intervenor:
Sarmad Syed and Ashley Balfour
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Lagrange v. Schlumberger Technology Corp et al
as 6:2015cv01187
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lagrange
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp and M I L L C
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Schlumberger Technology Corp v. Arklatex Wireline Services L L C
as 5:2014cv02818
Defendant:
Arklatex Wireline Services L L C
Plaintiff:
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stout v. Pathfinder Energy Services L L C et al
as 6:2014cv02457
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Stout
Defendant:
Pathfinder Energy Services L L C, Smith International Inc, Schlumberger Technology Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
