Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Sepulveda v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00749
Plaintiff:
George Sepulveda
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
F.E.S. et al
as 3:2014cv00739
Plaintiff:
F.E.S. , Aristides Sepulveda and Wanda Cruz
Defendant:
Casey M. Epperson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sepulveda v. Ebbert
as 1:2014cv00135
Petitioner:
George Sepulveda
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PARKS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05876
Plaintiff:
EUGENE PARKS and PATRICIA SEPULVEDA
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION , CARL PUCKEL, JR., JACOB ROSSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALBAYRAK et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05860
Plaintiff:
MIKE ALBAYRAK , TERRY BREWER , PHYLLIS CARTER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sepulveda et al v. United States Of America
as 1:2013cv01262
Plaintiff:
George Sepulveda, James Davenport and Shaun Tellado
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Sepulveda et al
as 3:2013cv00511
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Manuel Sepulveda and The Defenders Association of Philadelphia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
SEPULVEDA et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv39813
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL A. SEPULVEDA and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Sepulveda v. Holt
as 1:2010cv01861
Petitioner:
George Sepulveda
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SEPULVEDA v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77585
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL SEPULVEDA
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
