Cases 11 - 20 of 152
MOHAMMED v. EASTERBROOK et al
as 1:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
FRANK EASTERBROOK, VANITA GUPTA, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
AYELE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv01785
Plaintiff:
MEDHIN AYELE, STEPHANIE CARRINGTON, SHAWN DARNELL CHEATHAM and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SHIRLEY KWAN-HUI, SHARON LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEWMAN v. MOORE et al
as 1:2023cv01334
Not Classified By Court:
Hon. PAULINE NEWMAN
Plaintiff:
PAULINE NEWMAN
Defendant:
KIMBERLY A. MOORE, SHARON PROST, RICHARD G. TARANTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WEINSTOCK v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023mc00051
Plaintiff:
SHARON WEINSTOCK
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
WEINSTOCK v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023mc00050
Plaintiff:
SHARON WEINSTOCK
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and HAMAS-ISLAMIC RESISTANCE MOVEMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
HASSAN v. BALOGUN et al
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
DAVID HASSAN
Defendant:
OLAITAN BALOGUN, ADE SULE KOIKI, VIVIAN HOMER WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ASHFORD v. HELTON et al
as 1:2022cv03833
Plaintiff:
TONY ASHFORD
Defendant:
CATHELINE HELTON and SHARON CLARITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROTH v. WEST END PLASTIC SURGERY
as 1:2022cv03398
Plaintiff:
SHARON ROTH
Defendant:
WEST END PLASTIC SURGERY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SHEKAR v. DUFF et al
as 1:2022cv02123
Defendant:
STEVE GILMAN, JOAQUIN ARCHIVALDO GUZMAN, JAMES DUFF and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
