Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Medrano v. Melvin et al
as 1:2017cv01157
Plaintiff:
Jose Medrano
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, John Baldwin, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Garza v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01057
Plaintiff:
Cesar De La Garza
Defendant:
John . Baldwin, Gladyse Taylor, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garske v. Conn et al
as 1:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
Richard Garske
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, . Ojelade, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Tilden et al
as 1:2015cv01224
Plaintiff:
Wynston Day
Defendant:
. Tilden, Melvin Hinton, Michael Dempsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Pfister et al
as 1:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Charles Sharp
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Guy Pierce, Sr, Annabelle Mottelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hansen et al
as 1:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Williams
Defendant:
Sharon Hansen, Michelle R Clark, Robert Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medrano v. Ghosh et al
as 1:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jose Medrano
Defendant:
Dr. Ghosh, Louis Shicker, Charles Fasano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Tilden et al
as 1:2012cv01376
Plaintiff:
Kierra Lacey James
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, Alton Angus, Jose Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Prentice et al
as 1:2012cv01221
Plaintiff:
Michael Hall
Defendant:
Susan Prentice, Andre Tilder, Kohlmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett et al v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2012cv03095
Plaintiff:
Donnie Barrett, Michael Halbrook, Kenneth Seidler and others
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Services, Forrest Ashby, Reggy Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
