Cases 11 - 18 of 18
California Bank & Trust v Shilo Inn, Twin Falls, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
California Bank & Trust
Defendant:
Shilo Inn and Mark S. Hemstreet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
California Bank & Trust v. Shilo Inn et al
as 1:2012cv00141
Defendant:
Mark S. Hemstreet and Shilo Inn
Plaintiff:
California Bank & Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sterling Savings Bank v. Shilo Inn Tillamook et al
as 3:2012cv00191
Defendant:
Mark S Hemstreet and Shilo Inn Tillamook
Plaintiff:
Sterling Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
East West Bank v. Hemstreet
as 1:2011cv03160
Plaintiff:
East West Bank
Defendant:
Mark S Hemstreet and Shilo Inn, Klamath Falls, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Shilo Inn, Seaside Oceanfront, v. James Grant, et al
as 09-35839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHILO INN, SEASIDE OCEANFRONT, LLC, (Judgement Creditor/Garnishor)
Appellee:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GRANT, (Judgment Debtor), DBA J. Grant & Associates, DBA TouchStone Granite & Marble
Haro v. Shilo Inn, Bend LLC et al
as 6:2008cv06306
Plaintiff:
Robert Angel Haro
Defendant:
Shilo Inn, Bend LLC, Shilo Management Corporation, Shilo Restaurant Corporations and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shilo Inn, Seaside Oceanfront, LLC v. Grant et al
as 3:2008cv00618
Plaintiff:
Shilo Inn, Seaside Oceanfront, LLC
Defendant:
James Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Shilo Inn, Seaside Oceanfront, LLC v. Grant et al
as 3:2007cv01018
Plaintiff:
Shilo Inn, Seaside Oceanfront, LLC
Defendant:
James Grant, National Fire & Marine Insurance Company and National Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
