Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
TAITT et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2020cv01557
Plaintiff:
MARLON CARTER, LYNELL COOPER, PAUL GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, REPUBLIC OF SUDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
SIMMONS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2019cv02058
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Plaintiff:
SAMARA L. A. SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CLERMONT v. SOOTER et al
as 1:2019cv00314
Defendant:
JAKE FERRER, RICCARDO MARTINEZ, DEVIN COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
EMIL CLERMONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv03054
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AUDREY SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2018cv02425
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HAROLD WARD, MELISSA C. NETZNIK, K.A.H. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY, BANK MELLI IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
SIMMONS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2018cv02169
Defendant:
LANGSTON LANE APARTMENTS, ANNETTE ANDERSON, VICKIE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
ELIOSIE K. SIMMONS
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2018cv02166
Undetermined:
Eliosie K. Simmons, Vickie Williams, Langston Lane Apartments and others
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
SIMMONS v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv01293
Plaintiff:
KEITH SIMMONS
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SIMMONS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.
as 1:2018cv00895
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DANIEL TIPPS , ANTHONY LABRUNO and others
Plaintiff:
KENDALL SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
