Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Keith A. Stahl v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv01132
Plaintiff:
Keith Stahl
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secruity Administration and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Brill et al v. Postle et al
as 2:2019cv02027
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sluzinski, Thomas Morris III, Adam Duong and others
Defendant:
King's Casino, LLC, Justin F Kuraitis, Michael L Postle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00870
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STAHLS' INC v. CALIFORNIA GLOBAL SIGNS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., INC et al
as 2:2018cv08895
Defendant:
BEIJING CHINASIGNS INFORMATION CO., LTD and CALIFORNIA GLOBAL SIGNS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., INC
Plaintiff:
STAHLS' INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Stahls Inc. v. California Global Signs Information Technology Co., Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv08897
Defendant:
BEIJING CHINASIGNS INFORMATION CO., LTD, CALIFORNIA GLOBAL SIGNS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., INC, California Global Signs Information Technology Co., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
STAHLS' INC, Stahls Inc. and Stahls Inc. a Michigan corporation doing business as GroupeSTAHL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Victoria Stahl v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv06704
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Victoria Stahl
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06160
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv05639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stahl v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 3:2015cv04499
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Catherine Stahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
