Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Matt Karinski, et al v. Stamps.com, Inc., et al
as 20-80160
Respondent:
MATT KARINSKI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and INDIANA PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Leadf Plaintiff
Petitioner:
JEFF CARBERRY, STAMPS.COM, INC., KENNETH MCBRIDE and others
In Re stamps.com Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2020cv00929
Defendant:
Kenneth T. McBride, G. Bradford Jones, Theodore R. Samuels, II and others
Nominal Defendant:
Stamps.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joey Hill
Petitioner:
Michael Rado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harvey v. McBride et al
as 1:2019cv01861
Defendant:
Kenneth T. McBride, Kyle Huebner, G. Bradford Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Barton Craig Harvey
Nominal Defendant:
Stamps.com, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Rado v. Kenneth T. McBride et al
as 2:2019cv04416
Defendant:
Kenneth T. McBride, G. Bradford Jones, Theodore R. Samuels, II and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re stamps.com Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 2:2019cv04272
Defendant:
Stamps.com, Inc., G. Bradford Jones, Theodore R. Samuels, II and others
Plaintiff:
Joey Hill
Petitioner:
Michael Rado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matt Karinski v. Stamps.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01828
Defendant:
Kyle Huebner, Kenneth McBride, Stamps.com, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matt Karinski
Alan Grabisch v. Stamps.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01497
Defendant:
Kyle Huebner, Stamps.com, Inc., Kenneth McBride and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Grabisch
Juan Lopez et al v. Stamps.com, Inc
as 2:2018cv01101
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Dixon and Juan Lopez
Defendant:
Stamps.com, Inc.
Pherah LLC v. Stamps.com, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01092
Plaintiff:
Pherah LLC
Defendant:
Stamps.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
