Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Staples, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mc91068
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, District of Columbia and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Staples, Inc. and Office Depot, Inc.
Staples, Inc. v. Boston Children's Hospital
as 1:2016mc91063
Plaintiff:
Staples, Inc.
Defendant:
Boston Children's Hospital
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Staples, Inc. v. Boston Children's Hospital
as 1:2016cv10415
Plaintiff:
Staples, Inc.
Defendant:
Boston Children's Hospital
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Staples, Inc. et al v. Kessenich
as 1:2015cv13447
Plaintiff:
Staples, Inc. and Staples Contract & Commercial, Inc.
Defendant:
Todd Kessenich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv30124
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Staples Inc. et al v. McDonald
as 1:2013cv12392
Plaintiff:
Staples Inc. and Staples Contract and Commercial, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Staples Inc., et al. v. Brenner
as 1:2013cv10396
Plaintiff:
Staples Inc. and Staples Contract and Commercial, Inc.
Defendant:
Brent Brenner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bensons International Systems, Inc. v. Staples, Inc.
as 1:2012cv11730
Plaintiff:
Bensons International Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Staples, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Staples, Inc. et al v. Ellison Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv11627
Plaintiff:
Staples, Inc. and Staples The Office Superstore, LLC
Defendant:
Ellison Systems, Inc. and Internet Shopping Outlet, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Burik v. Staples Contract & Commercial, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10806
Defendant:
Staples Contract & Commercial, Inc., Staples, Inc., Staples International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Burik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
