Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Henny v. Matevousian et al
as 0:2022cv02122
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Andre Matevousian, Dr. Reyna, T. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henny v. O'Connor et al
as 0:2022cv02121
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Patrick T. O'Connor, J. Stanek, Mistelle Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Starr et al
as 0:2022cv02030
Plaintiff:
Lakisha S Smith
Defendant:
Mistelle Starr, Dr. Reyna, Mr. McIntosh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv01999
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
Defendant:
Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. and AP Atlantic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Henny v. Starr et al
as 0:2022cv01996
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Defendant:
Mistelle Starr, McIntosh and Andre Mousetavian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frees v. Starr
as 0:2022cv01688
Petitioner:
Nastassia Frees, Nastassia (Goff) Frees and Nastassia Goff
Respondent:
Mistelle Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Biron v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2022cv01501
Plaintiff:
Lisa A. Biron
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Carvajal and Mistelle Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starr v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
Eric Lavone Starr
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Smith v. Starr et al
as 0:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Fellicia Smith
Defendant:
Mistelle Starr and Koch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saffore v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 0:2021cv02743
Petitioner:
Banita Brandise Saffore
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prison and Warden Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
