Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Sikhs for Justice et al v. Badal We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00723
Plaintiff: Sikhs for Justice, Shiromani Akali Dal, Jeet Singh and others
Defendant: Sukhbir Singh Badal and Parkash Singh Badal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sikhs For Justice (SFJ) et al v. Singh BADAL et al
as 1:2013cv04418
Plaintiff: Sikhs For Justice (SFJ), Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) (Amritsar), Jeet Singh and others
Defendant: Sukhbir Singh BADAL and Parkash Singh BADAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sukhbir Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71804
Petitioner: SUKHBIR SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Barapind v Government of the Republic of India, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00667
Plaintiff: Kulvir Singh Barapind
Defendant: Government of the Republic of India, The State Government of Pubjab, The Punjab Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Sukhbir Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71213
Petitioner: SUKHBIR SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Singh v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01482
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation
Plaintiff: Sukhbir Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sukhbir Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73097
Petitioner: SUKHBIR SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Sukhbir Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72737
Petitioner: SUKHBIR SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01976
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sukhbir Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71736
Petitioner: SUKHBIR SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?