Cases 11 - 20 of 239
Brandt et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02252
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Lock Brandt and John Brandt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02023
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Parker and Gary Parker
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv01238
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Inman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colella et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01010
Plaintiff:
Michele Suzanne Colella and Erminio Colella
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medoff et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00876
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Medoff and Stanton Medoff
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 6.31 Acres of Land More or Less in Marshall County, West Virginia et al
as 5:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
6.31 Acres of Land More or Less in Marshall County, West Virginia, Brian K. Milliken , Mary Lynn Milliken and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Harder v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00751
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Harder
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muggleton v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00731
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Muggleton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richey v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Richey
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bush v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv12386
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Bush
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
