Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Phillips v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv12124
Plaintiff:
Sybil Phillips
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luxton v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv11437
Plaintiff:
Sybil Luxton
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shepherd et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv08955
Plaintiff:
Sybil Shepherd and Mickel L. Shepherd
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dufour v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08683
Plaintiff:
Joan Sybil Dufour
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardesty v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05350
Plaintiff:
Sybil Sam E. Hardesty
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forsyth v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv02264
Plaintiff:
Sybil D. Forsyth
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32206
Plaintiff:
Sybil Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davila et al. v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30406
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Davila , Esther Albright , Martha Fancher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noble et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27737
Plaintiff:
Sybil Noble and Charles Noble
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv21291
Plaintiff:
Sybil Howell and William Jerry Howell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
