Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv62115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Claudio-Diaz v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2022cv14152
Plaintiff:
Desiree Claudio-Diaz
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smith v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Brad M. Smith
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Arora v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ashok Arora
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., John Does 1 through 50 and others
Trustee:
Aaron R. Cohen, court-appointed Chapter 7 Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maycom, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maycom, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. doing business as T-Mobile and Sprint Solutions, Inc. doing business as T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kotz v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kotz and Eugene Kotz, II
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
