Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Alanis et al v. Arkema, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02542
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cepeda, Jonisha J. Powell, John Ward and others
Defendant:
RICHARD RENNARD, Arkema, Inc., Richard Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Opoku et al
as 4:2019cv02057
Defendant:
Fort Bend County, Evelyn S. Opoku, Harris County and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Ortiz et al
as 5:2018cv00755
Defendant:
Maro Ortiz, J. Perales and Micheal McCampbell
Plaintiff:
Juan T. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lovo et al v. Express Courier International Inc et al
as 4:2016cv00853
Plaintiff:
Hugo Lovo , Bashar Masoud , Luis Gomez and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc., Lloyd Price, Lone Star Holdings, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Jones v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00619
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and William Stephens
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael T. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aubrey v. Mid Level Medical Providers et al
as 4:2015cv02870
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Chad Aubrey
Defendant:
Mid Level Medical Providers, Karen Faust, Patrick Muldonney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv02457
Petitioner:
Michael T Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00802
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael T. Jones
Respondent:
Williams Stepeans and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarado v. Roesier et al
as 1:2013cv00703
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alvarado
Defendant:
M Roesier and T Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
