Cases 11 - 20 of 20
American Medical Concepts, Inc. v. Bowlin et al
as 3:2013cv01240
Plaintiff:
American Medical Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Jason R. Bowlin, Dougherty Corporation, William J. Dougherty, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tate v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 3:2012cv01200
Defendant:
CIGNA Group Insurance and Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
Janice Tate
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Tate v. Bennett Law PLLC
as 2:2012cv00590
Defendant:
Bennett Law PLLC
Plaintiff:
James Tate
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Handel v. Goldberg et al
as 6:2010cv06240
Defendant:
Bruce Goldberg, Mike Marchant, Sylvia Rieger and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Handel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00665
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Tate v. Edward D. Jones & Co., LP et al
as 3:2010cv00610
Defendant:
Donald E. Ashley, EDJ Holding Company, Inc., Edward D. Jones & Co., LP and others
Plaintiff:
Arlene S. Tate
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tate v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2010cv00440
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Micheal A. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Tate v. Sygma Network, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00874
Plaintiff:
Travis Tate
Defendant:
Sygma Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Tate v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2007cv06115
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tate
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration and Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
IN RE: LAW STUDENT APPEARANCES
as 3:2007mc09006
Plaintiff:
Kasia Rutledge, Erik Eklund, Jay Bodzin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
