Cases 11 - 20 of 470
Speed v. Dowling et al
as 5:2018cv00962
Respondent:
Janet Dowling, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and Joe M Allbaugh
Petitioner:
Seth Harvey Speed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reese v. Fallin et al
as 5:2018cv00744
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, The Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County Public Defender and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Bryant et al
as 5:2018cv00616
Petitioner:
Rodney Deron Jackson
Respondent:
Jason Bryant and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Bryant
as 4:2018cv00123
Petitioner:
Joshua Tyrone Thomas
Respondent:
Jason Bryant and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. Bryant et al
as 4:2018cv00113
Petitioner:
Terrance Ivan Daniels
Respondent:
Jason Bryant and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimenez v. Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
as 5:2017cv01332
Petitioner:
Felicito Avendano Jimenez
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sturgis v. Bryant et al
as 5:2017cv01266
Petitioner:
John P Sturgis
Respondent:
Jason Bryant and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clay v. Dowling et al
as 5:2017cv00502
Petitioner:
Timothy W Clay
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berryhill v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma , Department of Corrections , Oklahoma City City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weimer v. Byrd et al
as 5:2017cv00079
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Weimer
Respondent:
Raymond Byrd and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
