Cases 11 - 17 of 17
THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. LITTLE
as 1:2009cv00624
Plaintiff:
THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
TERRY W. LITTLE
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. THOMASVILLE EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00623
Plaintiff:
THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
THOMASVILLE EXPRESS, INC., CHAMP RAY COOPER, JR. and BENJAMIN COOPER
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. PULASKI FURNITURE CORPORATION
as 1:2009cv00591
Plaintiff:
THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
PULASKI FURNITURE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Furnace Brook LLC v. Aeropostale, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv04310
Plaintiff:
Furnace Brook LLC, Furnace Brook LLC, Furnace Brook LLC and others
Defendant:
Aeropostale, Inc., Boston Proper, Inc., Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. LIFESTYLE ENTERPRISE, INC.
as 1:2007cv00677
Plaintiff:
THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
LIFESTYLE ENTERPRISE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
JGR, Inc. v. Thomasville
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-3262
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
JGR, INC.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.
JGR, Inc. v. Thomasville
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-3261
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
JGR, INC.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
THOMASVILLE FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.