Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Ohio & Vicinity Carpenters' Fringe Benefit Funds, Inc. v. Quality Overhead Door Co., Inc.
as 3:2019cv02106
Defendant:
A-1 Garage Door and Quality Overhead Door Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ohio & Vicinity Carpenters' Fringe Benefit Funds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Stoett Industries, Inc. et al v. Irvine Shade & Door, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01104
Plaintiff:
Stoett Industries, Inc. and Newline International, LLC
Defendant:
Irvine Shade & Door, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Walker v. Overhead Door Corporation
as 5:2017cv02698
Plaintiff:
Melissa Walker
Defendant:
Overhead Door Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Door County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2017op45104
Plaintiff:
Door County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kukura v. Ohio CVS Stores, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv02627
Plaintiff:
Ann J. Kukura
Defendant:
Ohio CVS Stores, LLC , Stanley Access Technologies, LLC , Montgomery Door Controls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Action Door of Lorain County, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02349
Plaintiff:
Peter Johnson
Defendant:
Action Door of Lorain County, Inc., Toni Marie Cavasini and David Cavasini
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tannehill v. Simonton Windows & Doors
as 2:2016cv00738
Plaintiff:
Chad Tannehill
Defendant:
Simonton Windows & Doors
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ProVia Door, Inc. et al v. proVia Home Services, LLC
as 5:2016cv01132
Plaintiff:
ProVia Door, Inc. and ProVia Products, LLC
Defendant:
proVia Home Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
