Cases 11 - 20 of 11,829
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Darling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Thomas P Darling
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ulitto v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ulitto
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Melo et al v. Eusebio et al
as 1:2024cv04726
Plaintiff:
Dioniso Melo and Silvia Duran
Defendant:
Eric Rojas Eusebio, Thomas Dexter, Harpreet Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jones v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bartoli et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2024cv04715
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Bartoli, Edward M. McKenna, Leon Bevans and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Other:
Jeanne Galletta and Mercedes Muentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
225 Northport, LLC v. McMullen et al
as 2:2024cv02967
Plaintiff:
225 Northport, LLC
Defendant:
Damon McMullen, Jeremy Maline, Thomas J. Kehoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
