Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00461
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Brown v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00009
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Thomas F. Brown
Interested Party: SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McCoy v. USA
as 2:2011cv00626
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Thomas F. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Siminski v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv09523
Plaintiff: Thomas F. Siminski, Thomas F. Siminski, Thomas F. Siminski and others
Defendant: American Standard, Inc., Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, Vapor, A Brunswick Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gomembers, Inc. v. Murray, Jonson, White & Associates, Ltd., P.C. et al
as 1:2008cv00549
Plaintiff: Gomembers, Inc.
Defendant: Murray, Jonson, White & Associates, Ltd., P.C., Thomas F. Flood and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Senture, LLC v. Dietrich et al
as 2:2008cv00237
Plaintiff: Senture, LLC and Senture, LLC
Defendant: Joseph E. Dietrich and Thomas F. Swider
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Piepenhagen v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2008cv00236
Plaintiff: Thomas F Piepenhagen
Defendant: Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
McCoy v. USA
as 2:2007cv00556
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Thomas F. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?