Cases 11 - 20 of 30
McGuire v. Inch et al
as 6:2019cv06689
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Ashley Moody and Mark Inch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire v. Inch et al
as 1:2019cv08598
Defendant:
State of Florida, Mark Inch and Ashley Moody
Plaintiff:
Tommy R. McGuire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Tommy R. McGuire
as 19-1855
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Ashley Moody, Attorney General of State of Florida and Mark S. Inch, Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections
McGuire v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00347
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGuire v. Inch
as 19-388
Respondent / Appellee:
Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Ashley Moody, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tommy R. McGuire
McGuire v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv07185
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Julie Jones, Pam Bondi and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGuire v. Jones
as 18-1345
Petitioner - Appellant:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent - Appellee:
Julie Jones, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections and Pamela Bondi, Attorney General State of Florida
McGuire v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
Tommy R. McGuire
Defendant:
Julie Jones and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommy McGuire v. Julia Jones, et al
as 17-56908
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMY R. MCGUIRE
Respondent - Appellee:
JULIA JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and STATE OF FLORIDA
McGuire v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv09564
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Julie Jones and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
