Cases 11 - 20 of 24
PALMER v. ASIAN EXPRESS TRAVEL INC et al
as 3:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
SEAN E. PALMER
Defendant:
ASIAN EXPRESS TRAVEL INC and JINBAO WANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
LAHOOD v. DOUBLE HAPPYNESS TRAVEL, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00304
Plaintiff:
RAY LAHOOD
Defendant:
DOUBLE HAPPYNESS TRAVEL, INC., LUN BING CHEN and LINDA CHEN
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 3102
WORLD TRAVEL, INC. v. BARWINCZAK
as 5:2011cv03933
Plaintiff:
WORLD TRAVEL, INC.
Defendant:
SCOTT M. BARWINCZAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TYGART et al v. AM RESORTS, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03714
Plaintiff:
CATHY SUE TYGART and LARRY TYGART
Defendant:
AM RESORTS, LLC , ATKINSON & MULLEN TRAVEL, INC. , ATKINSON & MULLEN TRAVEL II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ETZLER v. LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP et al
as 5:2010cv07009
Plaintiff:
DONALD ETZLER
Defendant:
LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP and WORLD TRAVEL INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
THE CORYN GROUP II, LLC et al v. O.C. SEACRETS, INC.
as 2:2009mc00162
Plaintiff:
THE CORYN GROUP II, LLC
Defendant:
O.C. SEACRETS, INC.
Petitioner:
ATKINSON & MULLEN TRAVEL, INC., AVW, INC. and BRENDAN AIRWAYS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
THE CORYN GROUP II, LLC et al v. O.C. SEACRETS, INC.
as 2:2009mc00161
Plaintiff:
THE CORYN GROUP II, LLC
Defendant:
O.C. SEACRETS, INC.
Petitioner:
ATKINSON & MULLEN TRAVEL, INC., AVW, INC. and BRENDAN AIRWAYS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
