Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 285
SL-X Trading Europe Limited, et al v. Bank Of America Corporation, et al
as 1:2019cv04885
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC, EquiLend Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff: SL-x Trading USA LLC, SL-x Technology UK Ltd., SL-x Trading Europe Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Nayani v. LifeStance Health Group, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06833
Plaintiff: Nizar S. Nayani
Defendant: LifeStance Health Group, Inc., Michael K. Lester, J. Michael Bruff and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Hechler v. Didi Global Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07550
Plaintiff: CORY HECHLER
Defendant: DIDI GLOBAL INC. F/K/A XIAOJU KUAIZHI INC., WILL WEI CHENG, ALAN YUE ZHUO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Jatin Chopra v. Didi Global Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05973
Plaintiff: Jatin Chopra
Defendant: Didi Global Inc.f/k/a Xiaoju Kuaizhi Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., Boci Asia Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
IN RE DIDI GLOBAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv05807
Plaintiff: RAFAELA ESPINAL, Shereen El-Nahas, Bosco Wang and others
Defendant: DIDI GLOBAL INC. F/K/A XIAOJU KUAIZHI INC., WILL WEI CHENG, ALAN YUE ZHUO and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Jatin Chopra, Michal Kucharski and Cory Hechler
Petitioner: Fah Liew, Junhong Cao, Yibin Wang and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Tao Zha
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In re: Treasury Securities Auction Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2015md02673
Plaintiff: Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Robert L. Teel and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: American Federation of Teachers, UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH, Rogers Varner, Jr. and others
Defendant: TD Securities (USA) LLC, Jeffries LLC, Barclays Bank, PLC and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: UFCW Local 1500 Pension Fund, University of Puerto Rico Retirement System, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC and others
Consolidated Defendant: Bank of America Corp. and John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016md02704
Defendant: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Triangle T Partners, LLC
Not Classified By Court: Tradition America LLC, Tullett Prebon Americas Corporation and tpSEF, Inc.
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Petitioner: Lawrence W. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Javelin Capital Markets LLC et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03542
Defendant: Bank Of America Corporation, ICAP Capital Markets LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Javelin Capital Markets LLC and Javelin SEF, LLC
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Zuhovitzky et al v. UBS AG Che 101.329.562 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv11124
Plaintiff: Jonathan Zuhovitzky and Esther Zuhovitzky
Defendant: UBS AG Che 101.329.562, UBS AG Che 412.669.376, UBS Financial Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04563
Plaintiff: The City of Philadelphia
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and others
Interested Party: The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?