Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Smith v. Townsend et al
as 3:2014cv00573
Plaintiff:
Torey Cortez Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Townsend, Unknown Brown, Hinds County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Davis v. EMCF Dental Dept. et al
as 4:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
EMCF Dental Dept., Rosalyn Gambrell, Unknown Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Warnock et al
as 4:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Defendant:
Shannon Warnock, Emmit L. Sparkman, Bartley Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Hinds County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2009cv00592
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Willis
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff Department, Unknown Colbert, Unknown Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hantzis v. Moore et al
as 5:2009cv00156
Defendant:
Unknown Moore, Bruce Pearson, Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hantzis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Davis v. Epps et al
as 4:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
Kevin Terrence Davis
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Winding v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
E.L. Sparkman, Dale Caskey, Bart Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Luckett v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00083
Plaintiff:
Alvin V. Luckett, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Epps, Lawrence Kelly, Charles Hand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Hardy et al
as 4:2007cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moody
Defendant:
Larry Hardy, Charles Hall, Richard Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
