Cases 11 - 20 of 230
ROOKS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J. ROOKS
Defendant:
TOMMY SMITH, SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON CO., TERRY E. BAMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KLAYMAN v. RAO et al
as 1:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Defendant:
NEOMI RAO, ROBERT L. WILKINS, KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WALKER v. VILSACK
as 1:2023cv01426
Plaintiff:
ANDREA WALKER
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
WALKER v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2022mc00123
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Petitioner:
ASHLEY WALKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DURBIN v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv03222
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL DURBIN
Defendant:
NANCY PATRICIA PELOSI, CHARLES ELLIS SCHUMER, ADDISON MITCHELL MCCONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
O'FERRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
CINDY-MAY O'FERRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHEKAR v. DUFF et al
as 1:2022cv02123
Defendant:
STEVE GILMAN, JOAQUIN ARCHIVALDO GUZMAN, JAMES DUFF and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv02061
Plaintiff:
GERALD WALKER
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
