Cases 11 - 20 of 34
STANLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
ALVIN STANLEY
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WHITENTIN, WARDEN BARNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Odum et al
as 5:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Hughes
Defendant:
Warden Roy Odum, Warden Cox, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. ODUM et al
as 7:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
QUANTOVIA ROBINSON
Defendant:
Warden ODUM, Warden JONES, Warden COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Warden JONES, JONES, MOHAMMED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden Jones, Warden Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Warden JONES, Warden WISZ, Nurse JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Messick v. Ward et al
as 4:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Thomas Messick
Defendant:
Commissioner Timothy C. Ward, Warden Jones, Warden DW Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANLEY v. WHITENTIN et al
as 5:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
ALVIN GAMAR STANLEY
Defendant:
WARDEN WHITENTIN, WARDEN BARNETT, WARDEN SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Benton et al
as 4:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Ernest Howard King
Defendant:
Warden Brooks L. Benton, Deputy Warden Jones, Sgt. Michell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Woodard et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Rico Lamar Ballard
Defendant:
Sgt. Woodard, Deputy Warden Jones, Officer Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
