Cases 11 - 20 of 142
(PC) Dahl v. Wasco State Prison et al
as 2:2022cv01554
Plaintiff:
Bradley Wayne Dahl
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison, Shirley, B. Escamilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dahl v. Wasco State Prison et al
as 1:2022cv01153
Plaintiff:
Bradley Wayne Dahl
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison, Shirley, B. Escamilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Potts v. M. Soleimani, et al
as 22-15581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. POTTS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SOLEIMANI, CP&S and A. YOUSSEF, Chief M.D. Wasco State Prison Medical Department
(PC)Perez v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
Adrian Perez
Defendant:
Sandoval, Duran, Zerate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02227
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
(PC) Seymour v. Wasco State Prison Administration, et al.
as 1:2021cv01485
Plaintiff:
Aaron D. Seymour
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison Administration, Staff Warden, Safety Division of Wasco Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron D. Seymour v. Wasco State Prison Administration et al
as 2:2021cv07653
Plaintiff:
Aaron D. Seymour
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison Administration, Staff Warden, Safety Division of Wasco Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamaru I. Deen v. Los Angeles County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv05375
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison and Los Angeles County Jail
Plaintiff:
Kamaru I. Deen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. Wasco State Prison et al
as 1:2021cv00097
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison and Alexis Quiles
Plaintiff:
David Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Foster v. Shirley et al
as 1:2021cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jonas B. Foster
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison Correction Officers and H. Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
