Cases 11 - 20 of 2,840
PUGH v. WALKER
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LENARD PUGH
Defendant:
WARDEN HERBERT WALKER, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ayala v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ayala
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Warden Wheeler Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv04116
Respondent:
Warden Wheeler Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Carlos Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00125
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stoune v. Warden, FCI Atlanta
as 1:2024cv04080
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Atlanta
Petitioner:
Jon Christopher Stoune
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OSBORNE v. HATCHER et al
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY W OSBORNE
Defendant:
Nurse RANSOME, Mr. JEFFRIES, Deputy Warden MCDANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00123
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00122
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLEMENTS v. BEASLEY
as 5:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD CLEMENTS, JR
Respondent:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poole v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Warden Arron Panerio, Mike Smith and State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
David Robert Poole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
