Cases 11 - 20 of 691
Chappell v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv01098
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Petitioner:
Lamont L Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor, Antoine v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deon Taylor
Defendant:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James, Demetris v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Demetris A. James
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parlor, Lonnie v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00580
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Petitioner:
Lonnie Earl Parlor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peterson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Ali Aziz and Mark Peterson
Defendant:
Ms Simonson, Konrady Cromey, Warden Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonides-Torres, Ricardo v. FCI Oxford's Warden
as 3:2024cv00570
Respondent:
FCI Oxford's Warden
Petitioner:
Ricardo Leonides-Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schwantes v. Gierach et al
as 2:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Bradley Kenneth Schwantes
Defendant:
Sgt Nicholai and Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres, Jaime v. Emmerich, E. et al
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Jaime Angel Torres
Respondent:
The BOP and Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Villar v. Emmerich
as 3:2024cv00533
Petitioner:
Yonathan Leandro Villar
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coleman, Brandon v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Brandon Miguel Coleman
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
