Cases filed in Colorado
Cases 11 - 20 of 190
Clark v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01534
Petitioner: Michael Clark
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Williams
as 1:2023cv01517
Petitioner: Edwin Ackerman
Respondent: No Named Respondent and Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tensley v. Medical Staff et al
as 1:2023cv01460
Plaintiff: John Tensley
Defendant: Medical Staff and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01311
Petitioner: Deondre Davis
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrell v. Warden, USP Florence ADMAX We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01298
Petitioner: Brooks James Terrell
Respondent: Warden, USP Florence ADMAX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Aigbekaen v. Warden FCI Englewood
as 1:2023cv01226
Petitioner: Raymond Aigbekaen
Respondent: USA and Warden FCI Englewood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bickle v. Warden, FCI Englewood
as 1:2023cv01094
Petitioner: Nicholas Bickle
Respondent: Warden, FCI Englewood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Solazzo v. Legal Access Program et al
as 1:2022cv03196
Plaintiff: Andrew Solazzo
Defendant: Legal Access Program, Law Library, D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03113
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Frederick v. Warden et al
as 1:2022cv03059
Petitioner: Scotty Wayne Frederick
Respondent: Warden and Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?