Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Strong Carpet Cleaning Systems, LLC et al v. Strong American Dry Carpet Cleaning Technology, LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv02857
Defendant:
Strong American Dry Carpet Cleaning Technology, LLC , Brush and Clean, LLC , Marcus Agaton Wendt and others
Plaintiff:
Strong Carpet Cleaning Systems, LLC , Kelly Love and Michael Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06123
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
805) 289-6000 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
805) 642-4240 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Save CCSF Coalition et al v. Lim et al
as 3:2014cv05286
Plaintiff:
Save CCSF Coalition , Otto Pippenger and Dimitrios Philliou
Defendant:
Oliver Lim, Carlos Gaytan , Igor Boyko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIRO Advisory Services, Ltd. v. D.A. Davidson & Co. et al
as 3:2014cv01618
Plaintiff:
MIRO Advisory Services, Ltd.
Defendant:
D.A. Davidson & Co., Richard L. Wendt Trust, JWTR Oregon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calliance Realty Fund LLC v. Wendt
as 4:2013cv01402
Plaintiff:
Calliance Realty Fund LLC
Defendant:
Joan Wendt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Roebuck v. Wendt
as 3:2013cv00629
Plaintiff:
T. A. Roebuck
Defendant:
Joan Wendt, T.A. Roebuck 1992 Revocable Trust, Standard Trust Deeds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Roebuck v. Wendt
as 3:2012cv05958
Plaintiff:
T. A. Roebuck
Defendant:
Joan Wendt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Wendt et al
as 3:2012cv02225
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dennis Wendt, Wendt Construction Co., Inc. and www.perssard.inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Andrew Wendt LLC v. Robert C Rodrick
as 5:2010cv01349
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wendt LLC
Defendant:
Robert C Rodrick
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
