Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 209
LEWIS v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
as 2:2022cv02649
Plaintiff: WILLIAM LEWIS
Defendant: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2022cv00848
Plaintiff: Morganne Mease, Trenashia Jones, Rayna Moses and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as DE/1:22-CV-00848
Plaintiff: Jones, Morganne Mease, Trenashia Jones and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
LEWIS et al v. ROHO, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02122
Plaintiff: WILLIAM LEWIS and DIANE LEWIS
Defendant: ROHO, INC. and THE ROHO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02730
Plaintiff: WILLIAM LEWIS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORGAN v. DOZIER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv00164
Plaintiff: ANTONIO LAMAR MORGAN
Defendant: GREGORY C DOZIER, CHRISTOPHER CARR, MICHAEL BARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62979
Plaintiff: WILLIAM LEWIS CLAYTON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. HARRY et al
as 2:2021cv04176
Petitioner: WILLIAM LEWIS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MS. HARRY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50895
Plaintiff: WILLIAM LEWIS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William LanhamIn re: William Lanham
as 21-5846
Petitioner: In re: WILLIAM LEWIS LANHAM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?