Cases 11 - 20 of 134
Moore v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Laketha Moore
Defendant:
William Reubart, Jennifer Nash, Gabrielle Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Flynn v. NDOC et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dawnyell Flynn
Defendant:
NDOC, FMWCC, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plasnyer v. Dzuranda et al
as 3:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Bric Plasnyer
Defendant:
James Dzuranda, William Reubart, Jose Navarrete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vandecar v. Reubart, et al.
as 23-3622
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY VANDECAR
Respondent:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Watson v. Ruebart et al
as 2:2023cv01505
Petitioner:
Kedria D. Watson
Respondent:
William Reubart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Ackerman v. Aramark et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Aramark, David Drummond, William Reubart and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maestas v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Mr. Beau Maestas
Defendant:
Warden Gittere, William Reubart and J Verde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris, Tavete Letoi, Rafael Bonet and others
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Mr. James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
