Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03231
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JONES
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES et al v. THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03727
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JONES and LINDA JONES
Defendant: THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv02707
Plaintiff: THOMAS WILLIAM JONES, III
Defendant: SHIRLEY LAWS SMITH, CCS, MANAGEMENT SERVICES, ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv07373
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JONES
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv04493
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JONES
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64345
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JONES and LIZZIE JONES
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40167
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JONES
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BOURNE v. PRESIDENT JUDGE OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2009cv04504
Plaintiff: ROBERT M. BOURNE
Defendant: PRESIDENT JUDGE OF LANCASTER, CRAIG STEDMAN, KAREN MANSFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76187
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JONES
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
JONES v. AC&S et al
as 2:2008cv89288
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JONES
Defendant: AC&S, AC&S, AC&S and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?