Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Monroe v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
as 2:2017cv01625
Plaintiff:
Richard L Monroe
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas Slottke, Sr. v. State of Wisconsin - DILHR, et al
as 17-3329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. SLOTTKE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN - DILHR, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, THOMAS HARRINGTON and others
Patricia Williams v. Wisconsin Department of Workf
as 17-2702
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Mayek, James et al
as 3:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James C. Mayek, Judith A. Mayek, Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
International Assoc. of Machin v. Ray Allen, et al
as 17-1178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS DISTRICT TEN AND LOCAL LODGE 873
Defendant - Appellant:
RAY ALLEN, in his capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development and JAMES R. SCOTT, in his capacity as Chairman of the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
Mallum v. Wisconsin Laborers' Health Fund et al
as 2:2016cv01190
Plaintiff:
George W Mallum
Defendant:
Wisconsin Laborers Health Fund, Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development , State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
