Cases 11 - 20 of 443,232
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Anthony v. Detention Officer Copper et al
as 4:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
Melinda Anthony
Defendant:
Detention Officer Copper, Harris County, Unknown 3rd Shift Sargeant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv02169
Plaintiff:
Zahoor Khan and Jalwa Naseem
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Parker v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Blair Parker
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Parker v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Blair Parker
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 4:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Tawana Johnson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
mCom IP, LLC v. The American National Bank of Texas
as 2:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
mCom IP, LLC
Defendant:
The American National Bank of Texas
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
USTA Technology, LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 4:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
USTA Technology, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC II and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
