Cases 11 - 20 of 235
RAZOR USA LLC et al v. SAKAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2023cv21383
Plaintiff:
RAZOR USA LLC and SHANE CHEN
Defendant:
SAKAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
RAGO v. MERCER et al
as 2:2023cv20749
Plaintiff:
AL RAGO
Defendant:
DARREN MERCER, HAO (KEVIN) CHEN, DOZY MMOBUOSI and others
CHEN v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2023cv11180
Plaintiff:
YEN-WEI CHEN
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERICK B GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
HENRY v. FUTU HOLDINGS LIMITED et al
as 2:2023cv03222
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER HENRY
Defendant:
FUTU HOLDINGS LIMITED, LEAF HUA LI and ARTHUR YU CHEN
RIGO FERNANDEZ v. DOUYU INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED et al
as 2:2023cv03161
Plaintiff:
DAVID RIGO FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DOUYU INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED, SHAOJIE CHEN and MINGMING SU
ARBOUR v. TINGO GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ARBOUR
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP, INC., DOZY MMOBUOSI, DARREN MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
BLOEDORN v. TINGO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03153
Plaintiff:
MARK J. BLOEDORN
Defendant:
TINGO GROUP INC., DARREN MERCER, DOZY MMOBUOSI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
CHEN et al v. RON HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02591
Plaintiff:
DAN DAN CHEN, MEI FENG LIN, XUE RAN HUANG and others
Defendant:
RON HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET INC. D/B/A HIBACHI GRILL SUPREME BUFFET, HE PING CHEN, QI YUN CHEN and others
CHEN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHEN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, EXECUTOR OF THE COUNTY OF NEWWARK, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
