Cases 11 - 20 of 35,523
Thomas Safran & Associates v. Jessica Vanover
as 2:2024cv03542
Plaintiff:
Thomas Safran & Associates
Defendant:
Jessica Vanover
U.S. Bank National Association v. Juan Enriquez et al
as 2:2024cv03499
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Juan Enriquez, Antonio Torres and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Lewis County et al
as 3:2024cv05333
Plaintiff:
Lewis County
Defendant:
City of Chehalis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bjarny Reyes v. Mayra Candelaria Munoz Gomez et al
as 2:2024cv03512
Plaintiff:
Bjarny Reyes
Defendant:
Mayra Candelaria Munoz Gomez and Jesus Rodriguez
County of Maui, Department of Environmental Management v. Komar Maui Properties I LLC
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
County of Maui, Department of Environmental Management
Defendant:
Komar Maui Properties I LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Thompson et al v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson and Cattail Creek Subdivision-Phase II
Defendant:
State of Montana, City of Bozeman, Cattail Creek Community Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gurner et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
John Gurner, Michelle Gurner, Claire Gurner and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DS HOUSING CCCRR-01, LP v. Exum
as 4:2024cv02552
Plaintiff:
DS HOUSING CCCRR-01, LP
Defendant:
Jessy Exum
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DUNN et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 2:2024cv03504
Plaintiff:
JON DUNN and Laura Dunn
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
