Cases 11 - 20 of 63,098
Afshar Shandiz v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Ali Afshar Shandiz
Defendant:
State of Texas and Officer Fusilier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Willimas v. Louisville Metro Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv03225
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Detention Center, Chief Jailer, Public Affairs and Human Resources Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thillainathan v. USA
as 3:2024cv00789
Petitioner:
Ananthakumar Thillainathan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. Osborn
as 3:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Quincy Mitchell
Defendant:
Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arbelo v. Osborn Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Anthony Arbelo
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griggs v. Department of Correctional
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Curtis Griggs
Defendant:
Department of Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D'Angelo v. Filicetti et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Carlo Robert D'Angelo
Defendant:
Michael Filicetti and Mehmet Kirk Okay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Louisville Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv03227
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville Police Dept. and Victims Rights and Advocacy Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tisdale v. USA
as 6:2024cv06256
Petitioner:
Marquis Tisdale
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Young v. USA
as 6:2024cv06253
Petitioner:
James Oliver Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
