Cases 11 - 20 of 641,062
Nancie Kopesky v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Nancie Kopesky
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McColum v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Mone R McColum
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
State of Nebraska et al v. Cliff et al
as 2:2024cv01364
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, Arizona State Legislature and others
Defendant:
Steven S. Cliff and Robert A. Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Martin v. Saint Agnes Medical Center
as 1:2024at00387
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Saint Agnes Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00389
Plaintiff:
Robby Sean Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
In Re Malcolm and Judith Curtis et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv01966
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Chauhan et al v. Jhuty et al
as 3:2024cv02875
Plaintiff:
Rajeev Chauhan, Randeep Panag and JAI Estates Canada, Inc.
Defendant:
Laddi Jhuty, NRI Orchards LLC, NRI Wealth Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rieffel v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02859
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Rieffel
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
