Cases 11 - 20 of 5,346
Noonan v. USA
as 5:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Deanthony L. Noonan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Webb v. Denny et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Bass Webb
Defendant:
Jason Denny, Sergeant Prinkey, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daugherty v. KY State Penitentiary et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
William J. Daugherty
Defendant:
KY State Penitentiary and Northpoint Training Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Thompson v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amy Robey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Nurse Provider Smith, Comprehensive Correctional Care, Calloway County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomason v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Thomason
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Officer James et al
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Officer James and Nurse John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Logan County et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Logan County, Christphor Michael Trimmer, Juana Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Jesse et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Cain
Defendant:
Lt. Cayla Jesse, Ofc Cross, Ofc David Killop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. Louisville Metro Corrections Medical Staff
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Darinaija Moon and Duwan Mudd
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
