Cases 11 - 20 of 4,196
Kennedy v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
David M Kennedy, Jr
Defendant:
Douglas Wheeler, Stephen Dean, Gary Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Stockman v. Edwards
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Randy Malcolm Stockman
Defendant:
Toney Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brasher v. 15th Judicial District Court et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jaci Loveless Brasher
Defendant:
15th Judicial District Court, Susan Theall, David Blanchet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adeyemi v. Bunkie
as 1:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Acqueline Sunshine Adeyemi
Defendant:
City of Bunkie and X Y Z Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jack et al v. Thomas et al
as 6:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Reggis Quentin Jack and Jona Huval
Defendant:
Cody Thomas, Jonathan Dungin, Jessica Laborde and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lacroix. City of Pineville et al
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Charles Lacroix
Defendant:
City of Pineville and James Gilchrist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
