Cases 11 - 20 of 25,544
Queen v. Bianton et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Cedirc Queen and Cedric Queen
Defendant:
Rayven Bianton and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras-Hernandez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Jose Contreras-Hernandez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moncrief v. Public Defender's Office
as 6:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Damien Rashad Moncrief
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office, Craig King, Anna Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Wiley
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Jerome Richardson
Defendant:
Jeremy Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. American Municipal Services et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jackson
Defendant:
American Municipal Services, Larry Bergman, Greg Pitchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huglon v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
S L Huglon
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magee v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Petitioner:
Covonta Magee
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Sorrell Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Randy Smith, Jose Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Cody Mitchell, Jules Herbert, Connor Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
En'Derrell Hawkins
Defendant:
Det Davis, Det Doyle, Det Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
