Civil Rights Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 11 - 20 of 8,641
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff: Bobbie Adams
Defendant: Sheriff Bryan Bailey, K-9 Officer Tony Shack, Investigator Christian Dedmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. City of Poplarville, MS
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Bert Martin
Defendant: City of Poplarville, MS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lacey v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff: Reginald Lacey
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moslow et al v. City Of Southaven, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: David Warran Moslow, Jr. and Suzanne Moslow
Defendant: City Of Southaven, Mississippi, Southaven Police Department, Former Police Chief Macon Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury Venue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?