Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 11 - 20 of 14,062
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff: DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant: SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. USA
as 3:2024cv00172
Petitioner: KADEEM INGRAM
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff: CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant: J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHEL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00175
Petitioner: JEFFREY MICHEL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BRYANT v. KIRKLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff: BUSTER BRYANT
Defendant: AARON A KIRKLAND, PATTON and ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff: JOHNNY JENKINS
Defendant: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHRISTOPHE v. DOE
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: ILMART CHRISTOPHE
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOGGS v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant: DAVIS, BRICE GOOGLE, D WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TATE v. OKALOOSA CORRECTION INSTITUTION
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: CLARENCE KEVIN TATE, III
Defendant: OKALOOSA CORRECTION INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner: REGINALD HILL
Respondent: WARDEN JEFFERSON CI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?