Cases 11 - 20 of 10,048
Rhine et al v. Swissport Cargo Services, L.P.
as 1:2024cv01332
Plaintiff:
Richard Rhine, Jr. and Rita Rhine
Defendant:
Swissport Cargo Services, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jones v. Queen Anne's County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01333
Plaintiff:
Donald Jones
Defendant:
Queen Anne's County, Maryland, Warden/Director Lamonte Cooke, Sgt. Daniel Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Riddick v. MedStar Health, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01335
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Riddick
Defendant:
MedStar Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Richter v. MedStar Health, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
David Richter
Defendant:
MedStar Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Luedtke v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01320
Plaintiff:
Dianne Luedtke
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC and Byzantine, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
v. Pope et al
as 8:2024cv01307
Defendant:
Shaya Pope and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 8715 Claims against the US - Jurisdiction of Courts
Pope v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
Shaya Pope
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 8715 Claims against the US - Jurisdiction of Courts
Dowdy v. Advarra, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01306
Plaintiff:
Oren Dowdy
Defendant:
Advarra, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walker v. Visser et al
as 8:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Walker
Defendant:
Dorathea Visser and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Kraemer v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Kraemer
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
