Cases 191 - 200 of 308
Obsession Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. et al v. The City of Rochester
as 6:2015cv06152
Plaintiff:
Obsession Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. and Joan C. Ortiz
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. City of Rochester, New York et al
as 6:2015cv06074
Plaintiff:
Chiquanda Sanders
Defendant:
City of Rochester, New York, Rochester City Police, Charles A. Lo Faso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2015cv06049
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chapman
Defendant:
City of Rochester , Eliud Rodriguez , Michael Perkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kabrovski, et al v. City of Rochester, et al
as 6:2015cv06030
Plaintiff:
John Kabrovski and Michelle McQuay
Defendant:
City of Rochester, New York, Heidi Zimmer-Meyer, Eugenio Marlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. The City Of Rochester et al
as 6:2014cv06719
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Santiago
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, The City of Rochester Police Force and Shawn Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of Rochester, New York et al
as 6:2014cv06708
Plaintiff:
Quinton Brown
Defendant:
City of Rochester, New York, Rochester Police Department, James Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wolfe v. City of Rochester, et al.,
as 6:2014cv06581
Plaintiff:
Barry Wolfe
Defendant:
City of Rochester and Delmonize A Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harmon v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2014cv06562
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Harmon
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department, Brian Marone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv06537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
